ID

VAR-201201-0312

CVE

CVE-2011-4577

TITLE

Fiery Network Controllers for Xerox DocuColor 242/252/260 Printer/Copier use a vulnerable version of OpenSSL

DESCRIPTION

OpenSSL before 0.9.8s and 1.x before 1.0.0f, when RFC 3779 support is enabled, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (assertion failure) via an X.509 certificate containing certificate-extension data associated with (1) IP address blocks or (2) Autonomous System (AS) identifiers. Fiery Network Controllers for Xerox DocuColor 242/252/260 Printer/Copier use a vulnerable version of OpenSSL (0.9.8o). OpenSSL prone to multiple security vulnerabilities. An attacker may leverage these issues to obtain sensitive information, cause a denial-of-service condition and perform unauthorized actions. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Note: the current version of the following document is available here: https://h20566.www2.hp.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/ docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c03360041 SUPPORT COMMUNICATION - SECURITY BULLETIN Document ID: c03360041 Version: 1 HPSBMU02786 SSRT100877 rev.1 - HP System Management Homepage (SMH) Running on Linux and Windows, Remote Unauthorized Access, Disclosure of Information, Data Modification, Denial of Service (DoS), Execution of Arbitrary Code NOTICE: The information in this Security Bulletin should be acted upon as soon as possible. Release Date: 2012-06-26 Last Updated: 2012-06-26 Potential Security Impact: Remote unauthorized access, disclosure of information, data modification, Denial of Service (DoS), execution of arbitrary code Source: Hewlett-Packard Company, HP Software Security Response Team VULNERABILITY SUMMARY Potential security vulnerabilities have been identified with HP System Management Homepage (SMH) running on Linux and Windows. The vulnerabilities could be exploited remotely resulting in unauthorized access, disclosure of information, data modification, Denial of Service (DoS), and execution of arbitrary code. References: CVE-2011-1944, CVE-2011-2821, CVE-2011-2834, CVE-2011-3379, CVE-2011-3607, CVE-2011-4078, CVE-2011-4108, CVE-2011-4153, CVE-2011-4317, CVE-2011-4415, CVE-2011-4576, CVE-2011-4577, CVE-2011-4619, CVE-2011-4885, CVE-2012-0021, CVE-2012-0027, CVE-2012-0031, CVE-2012-0036, CVE-2012-0053, CVE-2012-0057, CVE-2012-0830, CVE-2012-1165, CVE-2012-1823, CVE-2012-2012 (AUTOCOMPLETE enabled), CVE-2012-2013 (DoS), CVE-2012-2014 (Improper input validation), CVE-2012-2015 (Privilege Elevation), CVE-2012-2016 (Information disclosure), SSRT100336, SSRT100753, SSRT100669, SSRT100676, SSRT100695, SSRT100714, SSRT100760, SSRT100786, SSRT100787, SSRT100815, SSRT100840, SSRT100843, SSRT100869 SUPPORTED SOFTWARE VERSIONS*: ONLY impacted versions are listed. HP System Management Homepage (SMH) before v7.1.1 running on Linux and Windows. BACKGROUND CVSS 2.0 Base Metrics =========================================================== Reference Base Vector Base Score CVE-2012-2012 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:P) 9.7 CVE-2012-2013 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P) 6.8 CVE-2012-2014 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:S/C:N/I:N/A:N) 6.8 CVE-2012-2015 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N) 6.5 CVE-2012-2016 (AV:L/AC:M/Au:S/C:C/I:N/A:N) 4.4 CVE-2011-1944 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C) 9.3 CVE-2011-2821 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P) 7.5 CVE-2011-2834 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P) 6.8 CVE-2011-3379 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P) 7.5 CVE-2011-3607 (AV:L/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P) 4.4 CVE-2011-4078 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 5.0 CVE-2011-4108 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N) 4.3 CVE-2011-4153 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 5.0 CVE-2011-4317 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N) 4.3 CVE-2011-4415 (AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 1.2 CVE-2011-4576 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N) 5.0 CVE-2011-4577 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 4.3 CVE-2011-4619 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 5.0 CVE-2011-4885 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 5.0 CVE-2012-0021 (AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 2.6 CVE-2012-0027 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 5.0 CVE-2012-0031 (AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P) 4.6 CVE-2012-0036 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P) 7.5 CVE-2012-0053 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N) 4.3 CVE-2012-0057 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N) 6.4 CVE-2012-0830 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P) 7.5 CVE-2012-1165 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 5.0 CVE-2012-1823 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P) 7.5 =========================================================== Information on CVSS is documented in HP Customer Notice: HPSN-2008-002 RESOLUTION HP has provided HP System Management Homepage v7.1.1 or subsequent to resolve the vulnerabilities. HP System Management Homepage v7.1.1 is available here: HP System Management Homepage for Windows x64 [Download here] or enter the following URL into the browser address window. http://h20566.www2.hp.com/portal/site/hpsc/template.PAGE/public/psi/swdDetail s/?sp4ts.oid=4091409&spf_p.tpst=psiSwdMain&spf_p.prp_psiSwdMain=wsrp-navigati onalState%3Dlang%253Den%257Ccc%253DUS%257CprodSeriesId%253D4091408%257CprodNa meId%253D4091409%257CswEnvOID%253D4064%257CswLang%253D8%257CswItem%253DMTX-ab 0d4e9bb4654a8da503eccfd9%257Cmode%253D3%257Caction%253DdriverDocument&javax.p ortlet.begCacheTok=com.vignette.cachetoken&javax.portlet.endCacheTok=com.vign ette.cachetoken HP System Management Homepage for Windows x86 [Download here] or enter the following URL into the browser address window. http://h20566.www2.hp.com/portal/site/hpsc/template.PAGE/public/psi/swdDetail s/?sp4ts.oid=4091409&spf_p.tpst=psiSwdMain&spf_p.prp_psiSwdMain=wsrp-navigati onalState%3Dlang%253Den%257Ccc%253DUS%257CprodSeriesId%253D4091408%257CprodNa meId%253D4091409%257CswEnvOID%253D4022%257CswLang%253D8%257CswItem%253DMTX-f7 c0d15d28474255bd0ec23136%257Cmode%253D3%257Caction%253DdriverDocument&javax.p ortlet.begCacheTok=com.vignette.cachetoken&javax.portlet.endCacheTok=com.vign ette.cachetoken HP System Management Homepage for Linux (AMD64/EM64T) [Download here] or enter the following URL into the browser address window. http://h20566.www2.hp.com/portal/site/hpsc/template.PAGE/public/psi/swdDetail s/?sp4ts.oid=4091409&spf_p.tpst=psiSwdMain&spf_p.prp_psiSwdMain=wsrp-navigati onalState%3Dlang%253Den%257Ccc%253DUS%257CprodSeriesId%253D4091408%257CprodNa meId%253D4091409%257CswEnvOID%253D4035%257CswLang%253D8%257CswItem%253DMTX-18 d373dd1361400fbaca892942%257Cmode%253D3%257Caction%253DdriverDocument&javax.p ortlet.begCacheTok=com.vignette.cachetoken&javax.portlet.endCacheTok=com.vign ette.cachetoken HP System Management Homepage for Linux (x86) [Download here] or enter the following URL into the browser address window. http://h20566.www2.hp.com/portal/site/hpsc/template.PAGE/public/psi/swdDetail s/?sp4ts.oid=4091409&spf_p.tpst=psiSwdMain&spf_p.prp_psiSwdMain=wsrp-navigati onalState%3Dlang%253Den%257Ccc%253DUS%257CprodSeriesId%253D4091408%257CprodNa meId%253D4091409%257CswEnvOID%253D4006%257CswLang%253D8%257CswItem%253DMTX-9e 8a0188f97d48139dcb466509%257Cmode%253D3%257Caction%253DdriverDocument&javax.p ortlet.begCacheTok=com.vignette.cachetoken&javax.portlet.endCacheTok=com.vign ette.cachetoken HISTORY Version:1 (rev.1) 26 June 2012 Initial release Third Party Security Patches: Third party security patches that are to be installed on systems running HP software products should be applied in accordance with the customer's patch management policy. Support: For issues about implementing the recommendations of this Security Bulletin, contact normal HP Services support channel. For other issues about the content of this Security Bulletin, send e-mail to security-alert@hp.com. Report: To report a potential security vulnerability with any HP supported product, send Email to: security-alert@hp.com Subscribe: To initiate a subscription to receive future HP Security Bulletin alerts via Email: http://h41183.www4.hp.com/signup_alerts.php?jumpid=hpsc_secbulletins Security Bulletin List: A list of HP Security Bulletins, updated periodically, is contained in HP Security Notice HPSN-2011-001: https://h20566.www2.hp.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/ docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c02964430 Security Bulletin Archive: A list of recently released Security Bulletins is available here: http://h20566.www2.hp.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/secBullArchive/ Software Product Category: The Software Product Category is represented in the title by the two characters following HPSB. 3C = 3COM 3P = 3rd Party Software GN = HP General Software HF = HP Hardware and Firmware MP = MPE/iX MU = Multi-Platform Software NS = NonStop Servers OV = OpenVMS PI = Printing and Imaging PV = ProCurve ST = Storage Software TU = Tru64 UNIX UX = HP-UX Copyright 2012 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Hewlett-Packard Company shall not be liable for technical or editorial errors or omissions contained herein. The information provided is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. To the extent permitted by law, neither HP or its affiliates, subcontractors or suppliers will be liable for incidental,special or consequential damages including downtime cost; lost profits;damages relating to the procurement of substitute products or services; or damages for loss of data, or software restoration. The information in this document is subject to change without notice. Hewlett-Packard Company and the names of Hewlett-Packard products referenced herein are trademarks of Hewlett-Packard Company in the United States and other countries. Other product and company names mentioned herein may be trademarks of their respective owners. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Gentoo Linux Security Advisory GLSA 201203-12 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - http://security.gentoo.org/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Severity: Normal Title: OpenSSL: Multiple vulnerabilities Date: March 06, 2012 Bugs: #397695, #399365 ID: 201203-12 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Synopsis ======== Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL, allowing remote attackers to cause a Denial of Service or obtain sensitive information. Affected packages ================= ------------------------------------------------------------------- Package / Vulnerable / Unaffected ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 dev-libs/openssl < 1.0.0g *>= 0.9.8t >= 1.0.0g Description =========== Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL: * Timing differences for decryption are exposed by CBC mode encryption in OpenSSL's implementation of DTLS (CVE-2011-4108). * Invalid parameters in the GOST block cipher are not properly handled by the GOST ENGINE(CVE-2012-0027). * An incorrect fix for CVE-2011-4108 creates an unspecified vulnerability for DTLS applications using OpenSSL (CVE-2012-0050). Workaround ========== There is no known workaround at this time. Resolution ========== All OpenSSL users should upgrade to the latest version: # emerge --sync # emerge --ask --oneshot --verbose ">=dev-libs/openssl-1.0.0g" References ========== [ 1 ] CVE-2011-4108 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-4108 [ 2 ] CVE-2011-4109 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-4109 [ 3 ] CVE-2011-4576 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-4576 [ 4 ] CVE-2011-4577 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-4577 [ 5 ] CVE-2011-4619 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-4619 [ 6 ] CVE-2012-0027 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2012-0027 [ 7 ] CVE-2012-0050 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2012-0050 Availability ============ This GLSA and any updates to it are available for viewing at the Gentoo Security Website: http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-201203-12.xml Concerns? ========= Security is a primary focus of Gentoo Linux and ensuring the confidentiality and security of our users' machines is of utmost importance to us. Any security concerns should be addressed to security@gentoo.org or alternatively, you may file a bug at https://bugs.gentoo.org. License ======= Copyright 2012 Gentoo Foundation, Inc; referenced text belongs to its owner(s). The contents of this document are licensed under the Creative Commons - Attribution / Share Alike license. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5 . -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ===================================================================== Red Hat Security Advisory Synopsis: Moderate: openssl security update Advisory ID: RHSA-2012:0059-01 Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Advisory URL: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0059.html Issue date: 2012-01-24 CVE Names: CVE-2011-4108 CVE-2011-4576 CVE-2011-4577 CVE-2011-4619 ===================================================================== 1. Summary: Updated openssl packages that fix multiple security issues are now available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6. The Red Hat Security Response Team has rated this update as having moderate security impact. Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) base scores, which give detailed severity ratings, are available for each vulnerability from the CVE links in the References section. 2. Relevant releases/architectures: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop (v. 6) - i386, x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop Optional (v. 6) - i386, x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux HPC Node (v. 6) - x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux HPC Node Optional (v. 6) - x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 6) - i386, ppc64, s390x, x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 6) - i386, ppc64, s390x, x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation (v. 6) - i386, x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation Optional (v. 6) - i386, x86_64 3. Description: OpenSSL is a toolkit that implements the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL v2/v3) and Transport Layer Security (TLS v1) protocols, as well as a full-strength, general purpose cryptography library. It was discovered that the Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) protocol implementation in OpenSSL leaked timing information when performing certain operations. A remote attacker could possibly use this flaw to retrieve plain text from the encrypted packets by using a DTLS server as a padding oracle. (CVE-2011-4108) An information leak flaw was found in the SSL 3.0 protocol implementation in OpenSSL. Incorrect initialization of SSL record padding bytes could cause an SSL client or server to send a limited amount of possibly sensitive data to its SSL peer via the encrypted connection. (CVE-2011-4576) A denial of service flaw was found in the RFC 3779 implementation in OpenSSL. A remote attacker could use this flaw to make an application using OpenSSL exit unexpectedly by providing a specially-crafted X.509 certificate that has malformed RFC 3779 extension data. (CVE-2011-4577) It was discovered that OpenSSL did not limit the number of TLS/SSL handshake restarts required to support Server Gated Cryptography. A remote attacker could use this flaw to make a TLS/SSL server using OpenSSL consume an excessive amount of CPU by continuously restarting the handshake. (CVE-2011-4619) All OpenSSL users should upgrade to these updated packages, which contain backported patches to resolve these issues. For the update to take effect, all services linked to the OpenSSL library must be restarted, or the system rebooted. 4. Solution: Before applying this update, make sure all previously-released errata relevant to your system have been applied. This update is available via the Red Hat Network. Details on how to use the Red Hat Network to apply this update are available at https://access.redhat.com/kb/docs/DOC-11259 5. Bugs fixed (http://bugzilla.redhat.com/): 771770 - CVE-2011-4108 openssl: DTLS plaintext recovery attack 771775 - CVE-2011-4576 openssl: uninitialized SSL 3.0 padding 771778 - CVE-2011-4577 openssl: malformed RFC 3779 data can cause assertion failures 771780 - CVE-2011-4619 openssl: SGC restart DoS attack 6. Package List: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop (v. 6): Source: ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Client/en/os/SRPMS/openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.src.rpm i386: openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm x86_64: openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop Optional (v. 6): Source: ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Client/en/os/SRPMS/openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.src.rpm i386: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-static-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm x86_64: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-static-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux HPC Node (v. 6): Source: ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6ComputeNode/en/os/SRPMS/openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.src.rpm x86_64: openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux HPC Node Optional (v. 6): Source: ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6ComputeNode/en/os/SRPMS/openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.src.rpm x86_64: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-static-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 6): Source: ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Server/en/os/SRPMS/openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.src.rpm i386: openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm ppc64: openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.ppc.rpm openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.ppc64.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.ppc.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.ppc64.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.ppc.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.ppc64.rpm s390x: openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.s390.rpm openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.s390x.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.s390.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.s390x.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.s390.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.s390x.rpm x86_64: openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 6): Source: ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Server/en/os/SRPMS/openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.src.rpm i386: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-static-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm ppc64: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.ppc64.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.ppc64.rpm openssl-static-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.ppc64.rpm s390x: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.s390x.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.s390x.rpm openssl-static-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.s390x.rpm x86_64: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-static-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation (v. 6): Source: ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Workstation/en/os/SRPMS/openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.src.rpm i386: openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm x86_64: openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation Optional (v. 6): Source: ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Workstation/en/os/SRPMS/openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.src.rpm i386: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-static-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm x86_64: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-static-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm These packages are GPG signed by Red Hat for security. Our key and details on how to verify the signature are available from https://access.redhat.com/security/team/key/#package 7. References: https://www.redhat.com/security/data/cve/CVE-2011-4108.html https://www.redhat.com/security/data/cve/CVE-2011-4576.html https://www.redhat.com/security/data/cve/CVE-2011-4577.html https://www.redhat.com/security/data/cve/CVE-2011-4619.html https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/#moderate 8. Contact: The Red Hat security contact is <secalert@redhat.com>. More contact details at https://access.redhat.com/security/team/contact/ Copyright 2012 Red Hat, Inc. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFPHySOXlSAg2UNWIIRAlYpAKCQCY5k4gZ5VKOHZekEaWFHDNjGZwCZAdR3 CJl5iUxU4cxJLOsSBESSRVs= =PMiS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- RHSA-announce mailing list RHSA-announce@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhsa-announce . Relevant releases/architectures: RHEV Hypervisor for RHEL-6 - noarch 3. The Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Hypervisor is a dedicated Kernel-based Virtual Machine (KVM) hypervisor. A heap overflow flaw was found in the way QEMU-KVM emulated the e1000 network interface card. A privileged guest user in a virtual machine whose network interface is configured to use the e1000 emulated driver could use this flaw to crash the host or, possibly, escalate their privileges on the host. The security fixes included in this update address the following CVE numbers: CVE-2009-5029 and CVE-2011-4609 (glibc issues) CVE-2012-0056 (kernel issue) CVE-2011-4108 and CVE-2012-0050 (openssl issues) This update also fixes the following bugs: * Previously, it was possible to begin a Hypervisor installation without any valid disks to install to. Now, if no valid disks are found for Hypervisor installation, a message is displayed informing the user that there are no valid disks for installation. (BZ#781471) * Previously, the user interface for the Hypervisor did not indicate whether the system was registered with Red Hat Network (RHN) Classic or RHN Satellite. As a result, customers could not easily determine the registration status of their Hypervisor installations. The TUI has been updated to display the registration status of the Hypervisor. (BZ#788223) * Previously, autoinstall would fail if the firstboot or reinstall options were passed but local_boot or upgrade were not passed. Now, neither the local_boot or upgrade parameters are required for autoinstall. 788225 - autoinstall fails when local_boot or upgrade not passed on command line 788226 - rhev-hypervisor6 6.2 Update 2 Release bugzilla 6. DTLS Plaintext Recovery Attack (CVE-2011-4108) ============================================== Nadhem Alfardan and Kenny Paterson have discovered an extension of the Vaudenay padding oracle attack on CBC mode encryption which enables an efficient plaintext recovery attack against the OpenSSL implementation of DTLS. Their attack exploits timing differences arising during decryption processing. A research paper describing this attack can be found at http://www.isg.rhul.ac.uk/~kp/dtls.pdf Thanks go to Nadhem Alfardan and Kenny Paterson of the Information Security Group at Royal Holloway, University of London (www.isg.rhul.ac.uk) for discovering this flaw and to Robin Seggelmann <seggelmann@fh-muenster.de> and Michael Tuexen <tuexen@fh-muenster.de> for preparing the fix. Double-free in Policy Checks (CVE-2011-4109) ============================================ If X509_V_FLAG_POLICY_CHECK is set in OpenSSL 0.9.8, then a policy check failure can lead to a double-free. The bug does not occur unless this flag is set. Users of OpenSSL 1.0.0 are not affected. This flaw was discovered by Ben Laurie and a fix provided by Emilia Kasper <ekasper@google.com> of Google. This affects both clients and servers that accept SSL 3.0 handshakes: those that call SSL_CTX_new with SSLv3_{server|client}_method or SSLv23_{server|client}_method. It does not affect TLS. This could include sensitive contents of previously freed memory. However, in practice, most deployments do not use SSL_MODE_RELEASE_BUFFERS and therefore have a single write buffer per connection. That write buffer is partially filled with non-sensitive, handshake data at the beginning of the connection and, thereafter, only records which are longer any any previously sent record leak any non-encrypted data. This, combined with the small number of bytes leaked per record, serves to limit to severity of this issue. Thanks to Adam Langley <agl@chromium.org> for identifying and fixing this issue. Malformed RFC 3779 Data Can Cause Assertion Failures (CVE-2011-4577) ==================================================================== RFC 3779 data can be included in certificates, and if it is malformed, may trigger an assertion failure. This could be used in a denial-of-service attack. Note, however, that in the standard release of OpenSSL, RFC 3779 support is disabled by default, and in this case OpenSSL is not vulnerable. Builds of OpenSSL are vulnerable if configured with "enable-rfc3779". Thanks to Andrew Chi, BBN Technologies, for discovering the flaw, and Rob Austein <sra@hactrn.net> for fixing it. Thanks to George Kadianakis <desnacked@gmail.com> for identifying this issue and to Adam Langley <agl@chromium.org> for fixing it. Invalid GOST parameters DoS Attack (CVE-2012-0027) =================================================== A malicious TLS client can send an invalid set of GOST parameters which will cause the server to crash due to lack of error checking. This could be used in a denial-of-service attack. Only users of the OpenSSL GOST ENGINE are affected by this bug. Thanks to Andrey Kulikov <amdeich@gmail.com> for identifying and fixing this issue. References ========== URL for this Security Advisory: https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20120104.txt

AFFECTED PRODUCTS