ID

VAR-201501-0338

CVE

CVE-2015-0204

TITLE

SSL/TLS implementations accept export-grade RSA keys (FREAK attack)

DESCRIPTION

The ssl3_get_key_exchange function in s3_clnt.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8zd, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0p, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1k allows remote SSL servers to conduct RSA-to-EXPORT_RSA downgrade attacks and facilitate brute-force decryption by offering a weak ephemeral RSA key in a noncompliant role, related to the "FREAK" issue. NOTE: the scope of this CVE is only client code based on OpenSSL, not EXPORT_RSA issues associated with servers or other TLS implementations. SSL/TLS Some implementations of export grade without intentional setting (512 Below bit ) of RSA Something accepts the key. Man-in-the-middle attacks against such software (man-in-the-middle attack) Is performed, the key used for encryption is decrypted, SSL/TLS The traffic content may be decrypted. this is" FREAK It is also called “attack”. Algorithm downgrade (CWE-757) CWE-757: Selection of Less-Secure Algorithm During Negotiation ('Algorithm Downgrade') https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/757.html Incorrect cipher strength (CWE-326) CWE-326: Inadequate Encryption Strength https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/326.html SSL/TLS Some implementations of export grade without intentional setting (512 Below bit ) of RSA Something accepts the key. If a man-in-the-middle attack is performed on such software, it is guided to use a weak key in the negotiation at the start of communication, and as a result, encrypted information may be decrypted. The discoverer has released detailed information about this matter. FREAK: Factoring RSA Export Keys https://www.smacktls.com/#freakMan-in-the-middle attacks (man-in-the-middle attack) By SSL/TLS The contents of the communication may be decrypted. OpenSSL is prone to security-bypass vulnerability. Successfully exploiting these issues may allow attackers to perform unauthorized actions by conducting a man-in-the-middle attack. This may lead to other attacks. The SSLv3 vulnerability using US export-grade RSA encryption known as FREAK could be exploited remotely to allow unauthorized References: CVE-2015-4000 (aka LogJam, SSRT102095) CVE-2015-2808 (aka Bar Mitzvah) CVE-2015-0204 (aka Freak) SUPPORTED SOFTWARE VERSIONS*: ONLY impacted versions are listed. HP Network Node Manager i version v9.0x. When OpenSSL is built with the no-ssl3 option and a SSL v3 ClientHello is received, the ssl method would be set to NULL which could later result in a NULL pointer dereference and daemon crash. CVE-2014-3571 Markus Stenberg of Cisco Systems, Inc. CVE-2015-0206 Chris Mueller discovered a memory leak in the dtls1_buffer_record function. For the upcoming stable distribution (jessie), these problems will be fixed soon. We recommend that you upgrade your openssl packages. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ===================================================================== Red Hat Security Advisory Synopsis: Important: Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 6.4.0 update Advisory ID: RHSA-2015:0849-01 Product: Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Advisory URL: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0849.html Issue date: 2015-04-16 CVE Names: CVE-2014-3570 CVE-2014-3586 CVE-2014-8111 CVE-2015-0204 CVE-2015-0226 CVE-2015-0227 CVE-2015-0277 ===================================================================== 1. Summary: Updated packages that provide Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 6.4.0, and fix multiple security issues, several bugs, and add various enhancements, are now available from the Red Hat Customer Portal. Red Hat Product Security has rated this update as having Important security impact. Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) base scores, which give detailed severity ratings, are available for each vulnerability from the CVE links in the References section. 2. Description: Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 6 is a platform for Java applications based on JBoss Application Server 7. It was found that a prior countermeasure in Apache WSS4J for Bleichenbacher's attack on XML Encryption (CVE-2011-2487) threw an exception that permitted an attacker to determine the failure of the attempted attack, thereby leaving WSS4J vulnerable to the attack. The original flaw allowed a remote attacker to recover the entire plain text form of a symmetric key. (CVE-2015-0226) A flaw was found in the way PicketLink's Service Provider and Identity Provider handled certain requests. A remote attacker could use this flaw to log to a victim's account via PicketLink. (CVE-2015-0277) It was discovered that a JkUnmount rule for a subtree of a previous JkMount rule could be ignored. This could allow a remote attacker to potentially access a private artifact in a tree that would otherwise not be accessible to them. A malicious server could make a TLS/SSL client using OpenSSL use a weaker key exchange method. (CVE-2015-0204) It was found that Apache WSS4J permitted bypass of the requireSignedEncryptedDataElements configuration property via XML Signature wrapping attacks. A remote attacker could use this flaw to modify the contents of a signed request. (CVE-2015-0227) It was found that OpenSSL's BigNumber Squaring implementation could produce incorrect results under certain special conditions. This flaw could possibly affect certain OpenSSL library functionality, such as RSA blinding. Note that this issue occurred rarely and with a low probability, and there is currently no known way of exploiting it. (CVE-2014-3570) It was found that the Command Line Interface, as provided by Red Hat Enterprise Application Platform, created a history file named .jboss-cli-history in the user's home directory with insecure default file permissions. This could allow a malicious local user to gain information otherwise not accessible to them. (CVE-2014-3586) The CVE-2015-0277 issue was discovered by Ondrej Kotek of Red Hat. This release of JBoss Enterprise Application Platform also includes bug fixes and enhancements. Documentation for these changes will be available shortly from the JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 6.4.0 Release Notes, linked to in the References. All users of Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 6.3 as provided from the Red Hat Customer Portal are advised to apply this update. The JBoss server process must be restarted for the update to take effect. 3. Solution: The References section of this erratum contains a download link (you must log in to download the update). Before applying this update, back up your existing Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform installation and deployed applications. 4. Bugs fixed (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/): 1126687 - CVE-2014-3586 JBoss AS CLI: Insecure default permissions on history file 1180184 - CVE-2015-0204 openssl: only allow ephemeral RSA keys in export ciphersuites (FREAK) 1180240 - CVE-2014-3570 openssl: Bignum squaring may produce incorrect results 1182591 - CVE-2014-8111 Tomcat mod_jk: information leak due to incorrect JkMount/JkUnmount directives processing 1191446 - CVE-2015-0226 wss4j: Apache WSS4J is vulnerable to Bleichenbacher's attack (incomplete fix for CVE-2011-2487) 1191451 - CVE-2015-0227 wss4j: Apache WSS4J doesn't correctly enforce the requireSignedEncryptedDataElements property 1194832 - CVE-2015-0277 PicketLink: SP does not take Audience condition of a SAML assertion into account 5. References: https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-3570 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-3586 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-8111 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-0204 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-0226 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-0227 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-0277 https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/#important https://access.redhat.com/jbossnetwork/restricted/listSoftware.html?downloadType=distributions&product=appplatform&version=6.4 https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/JBoss_Enterprise_Application_Platform/ 6. Contact: The Red Hat security contact is <secalert@redhat.com>. More contact details at https://access.redhat.com/security/team/contact/ Copyright 2015 Red Hat, Inc. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iD8DBQFVL+cgXlSAg2UNWIIRAgReAKCmbue7AHS0JviRhZ3Lf94SFWGFnwCeP1XZ 4LYefBygVEs7IHM2Q1P/dtg= =lhOf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- RHSA-announce mailing list RHSA-announce@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhsa-announce . -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 _______________________________________________________________________ Mandriva Linux Security Advisory MDVSA-2015:062 http://www.mandriva.com/en/support/security/ _______________________________________________________________________ Package : openssl Date : March 27, 2015 Affected: Business Server 2.0 _______________________________________________________________________ Problem Description: Multiple vulnerabilities has been discovered and corrected in openssl: Race condition in the ssl3_read_bytes function in s3_pkt.c in OpenSSL through 1.0.1g, when SSL_MODE_RELEASE_BUFFERS is enabled, allows remote attackers to inject data across sessions or cause a denial of service (use-after-free and parsing error) via an SSL connection in a multithreaded environment (CVE-2010-5298). The Montgomery ladder implementation in OpenSSL through 1.0.0l does not ensure that certain swap operations have a constant-time behavior, which makes it easier for local users to obtain ECDSA nonces via a FLUSH+RELOAD cache side-channel attack (CVE-2014-0076). The (1) TLS and (2) DTLS implementations in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1g do not properly handle Heartbeat Extension packets, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory via crafted packets that trigger a buffer over-read, as demonstrated by reading private keys, related to d1_both.c and t1_lib.c, aka the Heartbleed bug (CVE-2014-0160). The dtls1_reassemble_fragment function in d1_both.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8za, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0m, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1h does not properly validate fragment lengths in DTLS ClientHello messages, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (buffer overflow and application crash) via a long non-initial fragment (CVE-2014-0195). The do_ssl3_write function in s3_pkt.c in OpenSSL 1.x through 1.0.1g, when SSL_MODE_RELEASE_BUFFERS is enabled, does not properly manage a buffer pointer during certain recursive calls, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and application crash) via vectors that trigger an alert condition (CVE-2014-0198). The dtls1_get_message_fragment function in d1_both.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8za, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0m, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1h allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (recursion and client crash) via a DTLS hello message in an invalid DTLS handshake (CVE-2014-0221). OpenSSL before 0.9.8za, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0m, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1h does not properly restrict processing of ChangeCipherSpec messages, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to trigger use of a zero-length master key in certain OpenSSL-to-OpenSSL communications, and consequently hijack sessions or obtain sensitive information, via a crafted TLS handshake, aka the CCS Injection vulnerability (CVE-2014-0224). The ssl3_send_client_key_exchange function in s3_clnt.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8za, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0m, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1h, when an anonymous ECDH cipher suite is used, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and client crash) by triggering a NULL certificate value (CVE-2014-3470). Memory leak in d1_srtp.c in the DTLS SRTP extension in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1j allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a crafted handshake message (CVE-2014-3513). The SSL protocol 3.0, as used in OpenSSL through 1.0.1i and other products, uses nondeterministic CBC padding, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to obtain cleartext data via a padding-oracle attack, aka the POODLE issue (CVE-2014-3566). Memory leak in the tls_decrypt_ticket function in t1_lib.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8zc, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0o, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1j allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a crafted session ticket that triggers an integrity-check failure (CVE-2014-3567). The ssl23_get_client_hello function in s23_srvr.c in OpenSSL 0.9.8zc, 1.0.0o, and 1.0.1j does not properly handle attempts to use unsupported protocols, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and daemon crash) via an unexpected handshake, as demonstrated by an SSLv3 handshake to a no-ssl3 application with certain error handling. NOTE: this issue became relevant after the CVE-2014-3568 fix (CVE-2014-3569). The BN_sqr implementation in OpenSSL before 0.9.8zd, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0p, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1k does not properly calculate the square of a BIGNUM value, which might make it easier for remote attackers to defeat cryptographic protection mechanisms via unspecified vectors, related to crypto/bn/asm/mips.pl, crypto/bn/asm/x86_64-gcc.c, and crypto/bn/bn_asm.c (CVE-2014-3570). OpenSSL before 0.9.8zd, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0p, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1k allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and application crash) via a crafted DTLS message that is processed with a different read operation for the handshake header than for the handshake body, related to the dtls1_get_record function in d1_pkt.c and the ssl3_read_n function in s3_pkt.c (CVE-2014-3571). OpenSSL before 0.9.8zd, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0p, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1k does not enforce certain constraints on certificate data, which allows remote attackers to defeat a fingerprint-based certificate-blacklist protection mechanism by including crafted data within a certificate&#039;s unsigned portion, related to crypto/asn1/a_verify.c, crypto/dsa/dsa_asn1.c, crypto/ecdsa/ecs_vrf.c, and crypto/x509/x_all.c (CVE-2014-8275). The ssl3_get_cert_verify function in s3_srvr.c in OpenSSL 1.0.0 before 1.0.0p and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1k accepts client authentication with a Diffie-Hellman (DH) certificate without requiring a CertificateVerify message, which allows remote attackers to obtain access without knowledge of a private key via crafted TLS Handshake Protocol traffic to a server that recognizes a Certification Authority with DH support (CVE-2015-0205). Memory leak in the dtls1_buffer_record function in d1_pkt.c in OpenSSL 1.0.0 before 1.0.0p and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1k allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) by sending many duplicate records for the next epoch, leading to failure of replay detection (CVE-2015-0206). Use-after-free vulnerability in the d2i_ECPrivateKey function in crypto/ec/ec_asn1.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8zf, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0r, 1.0.1 before 1.0.1m, and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2a might allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory corruption and application crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a malformed Elliptic Curve (EC) private-key file that is improperly handled during import (CVE-2015-0209). The ASN1_TYPE_cmp function in crypto/asn1/a_type.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8zf, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0r, 1.0.1 before 1.0.1m, and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2a does not properly perform boolean-type comparisons, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (invalid read operation and application crash) via a crafted X.509 certificate to an endpoint that uses the certificate-verification feature (CVE-2015-0286). The ASN1_item_ex_d2i function in crypto/asn1/tasn_dec.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8zf, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0r, 1.0.1 before 1.0.1m, and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2a does not reinitialize CHOICE and ADB data structures, which might allow attackers to cause a denial of service (invalid write operation and memory corruption) by leveraging an application that relies on ASN.1 structure reuse (CVE-2015-0287). The X509_to_X509_REQ function in crypto/x509/x509_req.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8zf, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0r, 1.0.1 before 1.0.1m, and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2a might allow attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and application crash) via an invalid certificate key (CVE-2015-0288). The PKCS#7 implementation in OpenSSL before 0.9.8zf, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0r, 1.0.1 before 1.0.1m, and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2a does not properly handle a lack of outer ContentInfo, which allows attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and application crash) by leveraging an application that processes arbitrary PKCS#7 data and providing malformed data with ASN.1 encoding, related to crypto/pkcs7/pk7_doit.c and crypto/pkcs7/pk7_lib.c (CVE-2015-0289). The SSLv2 implementation in OpenSSL before 0.9.8zf, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0r, 1.0.1 before 1.0.1m, and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2a allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (s2_lib.c assertion failure and daemon exit) via a crafted CLIENT-MASTER-KEY message (CVE-2015-0293). The updated packages have been upgraded to the 1.0.1m version where these security flaws has been fixed. _______________________________________________________________________ References: http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2010-5298 http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2014-0076 http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2014-0160 http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2014-0195 http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2014-0198 http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2014-0221 http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2014-0224 http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2014-3470 http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2014-3513 http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2014-3566 http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2014-3567 http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2014-3569 http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2014-3570 http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2014-3571 http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2014-3572 http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2014-8275 http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-0204 http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-0205 http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-0206 http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-0209 http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-0286 http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-0287 http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-0288 http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-0289 http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-0293 http://openssl.org/news/secadv_20150108.txt http://openssl.org/news/secadv_20150319.txt _______________________________________________________________________ Updated Packages: Mandriva Business Server 2/X86_64: 324a85f7e1165ab02881e44dbddaf599 mbs2/x86_64/lib64openssl1.0.0-1.0.1m-1.mbs2.x86_64.rpm 9c0bfb6ebd43cb6d81872abf71b4f85f mbs2/x86_64/lib64openssl-devel-1.0.1m-1.mbs2.x86_64.rpm 58df54e72ca7270210c7d8dd23df402b mbs2/x86_64/lib64openssl-engines1.0.0-1.0.1m-1.mbs2.x86_64.rpm b5313ffb5baaa65aea05eb05486d309a mbs2/x86_64/lib64openssl-static-devel-1.0.1m-1.mbs2.x86_64.rpm a9890ce4c33630cb9e00f3b2910dd784 mbs2/x86_64/openssl-1.0.1m-1.mbs2.x86_64.rpm 521297a5fe26e2de0c1222d8d03382d1 mbs2/SRPMS/openssl-1.0.1m-1.mbs2.src.rpm _______________________________________________________________________ To upgrade automatically use MandrivaUpdate or urpmi. The verification of md5 checksums and GPG signatures is performed automatically for you. All packages are signed by Mandriva for security. You can obtain the GPG public key of the Mandriva Security Team by executing: gpg --recv-keys --keyserver pgp.mit.edu 0x22458A98 You can view other update advisories for Mandriva Linux at: http://www.mandriva.com/en/support/security/advisories/ If you want to report vulnerabilities, please contact security_(at)_mandriva.com _______________________________________________________________________ Type Bits/KeyID Date User ID pub 1024D/22458A98 2000-07-10 Mandriva Security Team <security*mandriva.com> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFVFTm1mqjQ0CJFipgRAoYFAKCaubn00colzVNnUBFjSElyDptGMQCfaGoS kz0ex6eI6hA6qSwklA2NoXY= =GYjX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- . ============================================================================ Ubuntu Security Notice USN-2459-1 January 12, 2015 openssl vulnerabilities ============================================================================ A security issue affects these releases of Ubuntu and its derivatives: - Ubuntu 14.10 - Ubuntu 14.04 LTS - Ubuntu 12.04 LTS - Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Summary: Several security issues were fixed in OpenSSL. Software Description: - openssl: Secure Socket Layer (SSL) cryptographic library and tools Details: Pieter Wuille discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled Bignum squaring. (CVE-2014-3570) Markus Stenberg discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled certain crafted DTLS messages. (CVE-2014-3571) Karthikeyan Bhargavan discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled certain handshakes. (CVE-2014-3572) Antti Karjalainen, Tuomo Untinen and Konrad Kraszewski discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled certain certificate fingerprints. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to trick certain applications that rely on the uniqueness of fingerprints. (CVE-2014-8275) Karthikeyan Bhargavan discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled certain key exchanges. (CVE-2015-0204) Karthikeyan Bhargavan discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled client authentication. This issue only affected Ubuntu 14.04 LTS and Ubuntu 14.10. This issue only affected Ubuntu 12.04 LTS, Ubuntu 14.04 LTS and Ubuntu 14.10. (CVE-2015-0206) Update instructions: The problem can be corrected by updating your system to the following package versions: Ubuntu 14.10: libssl1.0.0 1.0.1f-1ubuntu9.1 Ubuntu 14.04 LTS: libssl1.0.0 1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.8 Ubuntu 12.04 LTS: libssl1.0.0 1.0.1-4ubuntu5.21 Ubuntu 10.04 LTS: libssl0.9.8 0.9.8k-7ubuntu8.23 After a standard system update you need to reboot your computer to make all the necessary changes. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Note: the current version of the following document is available here: https://h20564.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/ docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c04774019 SUPPORT COMMUNICATION - SECURITY BULLETIN Document ID: c04774019 Version: 1 HPSBMU03409 rev.1 - HP Matrix Operating Environment, Multiple Vulnerabilities NOTICE: The information in this Security Bulletin should be acted upon as soon as possible. Release Date: 2015-08-24 Last Updated: 2015-08-24 Potential Security Impact: Remote unauthorized modification, unauthorized access, or unauthorized disclosure of information. Source: Hewlett-Packard Company, HP Software Security Response Team VULNERABILITY SUMMARY Potential security vulnerabilities have been identified with HP Matrix Operating Environment. The vulnerabilities could be exploited remotely resulting in unauthorized modification, unauthorized access, or unauthorized disclosure of information. References: CVE-2010-5107 CVE-2013-0248 CVE-2014-0118 CVE-2014-0226 CVE-2014-0231 CVE-2014-1692 CVE-2014-3523 CVE-2014-3569 CVE-2014-3570 CVE-2014-3571 CVE-2014-3572 CVE-2014-8142 CVE-2014-8275 CVE-2014-9427 CVE-2014-9652 CVE-2014-9653 CVE-2014-9705 CVE-2015-0204 CVE-2015-0205 CVE-2015-0206 CVE-2015-0207 CVE-2015-0208 CVE-2015-0209 CVE-2015-0231 CVE-2015-0232 CVE-2015-0273 CVE-2015-0285 CVE-2015-0286 CVE-2015-0287 CVE-2015-0288 CVE-2015-0289 CVE-2015-0290 CVE-2015-0291 CVE-2015-0292 CVE-2015-0293 CVE-2015-1787 CVE-2015-1788 CVE-2015-1789 CVE-2015-1790 CVE-2015-1791 CVE-2015-1792 CVE-2015-2134 CVE-2015-2139 CVE-2015-2140 CVE-2015-2301 CVE-2015-2331 CVE-2015-2348 CVE-2015-2787 CVE-2015-3113 CVE-2015-5122 CVE-2015-5123 CVE-2015-5402 CVE-2015-5403 CVE-2015-5404 CVE-2015-5405 CVE-2015-5427 CVE-2015-5428 CVE-2015-5429 CVE-2015-5430 CVE-2015-5431 CVE-2015-5432 CVE-2015-5433 SUPPORTED SOFTWARE VERSIONS*: ONLY impacted versions are listed. HP Matrix Operating Environment impacted software components and versions: HP Systems Insight Manager (SIM) prior to version 7.5.0 HP System Management Homepage (SMH) prior to version 7.5.0 HP Version Control Agent (VCA) prior to version 7.5.0 HP Version Control Repository Manager (VCRM) prior to version 7.5.0 HP Insight Orchestration prior to version 7.5.0 HP Virtual Connect Enterprise Manager (VCEM) prior to version 7.5.0 BACKGROUND CVSS 2.0 Base Metrics =========================================================== Reference Base Vector Base Score CVE-2010-5107 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 5.0 CVE-2013-0248 (AV:L/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:P) 3.3 CVE-2014-0118 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 4.3 CVE-2014-0226 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P) 6.8 CVE-2014-0231 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 5.0 CVE-2014-1692 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P) 7.5 CVE-2014-3523 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 5.0 CVE-2014-3569 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 5.0 CVE-2014-3570 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N) 5.0 CVE-2014-3571 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 5.0 CVE-2014-3572 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N) 5.0 CVE-2014-8142 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P) 7.5 CVE-2014-8275 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N) 5.0 CVE-2014-9427 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P) 7.5 CVE-2014-9652 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 5.0 CVE-2014-9653 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P) 7.5 CVE-2014-9705 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P) 7.5 CVE-2015-0204 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N) 4.3 CVE-2015-0205 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N) 5.0 CVE-2015-0206 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 5.0 CVE-2015-0207 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 5.0 CVE-2015-0208 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 4.3 CVE-2015-0209 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P) 6.8 CVE-2015-0231 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P) 7.5 CVE-2015-0232 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P) 6.8 CVE-2015-0273 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P) 7.5 CVE-2015-0285 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N) 4.3 CVE-2015-0286 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 5.0 CVE-2015-0287 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 5.0 CVE-2015-0288 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 5.0 CVE-2015-0289 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 5.0 CVE-2015-0290 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 5.0 CVE-2015-0291 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 5.0 CVE-2015-0292 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P) 7.5 CVE-2015-0293 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 5.0 CVE-2015-1787 (AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 2.6 CVE-2015-1788 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 4.3 CVE-2015-1789 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 4.3 CVE-2015-1790 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 5.0 CVE-2015-1791 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P) 6.8 CVE-2015-1792 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 5.0 CVE-2015-2134 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P) 6.0 CVE-2015-2139 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N) 3.5 CVE-2015-2140 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:N) 4.9 CVE-2015-2301 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P) 7.5 CVE-2015-2331 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P) 7.5 CVE-2015-2348 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N) 5.0 CVE-2015-2787 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P) 7.5 CVE-2015-3113 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C) 10.0 CVE-2015-5122 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C) 10.0 CVE-2015-5123 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C) 10.0 CVE-2015-5402 (AV:L/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C) 6.9 CVE-2015-5403 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N) 3.5 CVE-2015-5404 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N) 6.4 CVE-2015-5405 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P) 6.0 CVE-2015-5427 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N) 6.4 CVE-2015-5428 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N) 6.4 CVE-2015-5429 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N) 6.4 CVE-2015-5430 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N) 5.0 CVE-2015-5431 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:N) 4.9 CVE-2015-5432 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N) 6.4 CVE-2015-5433 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N) 3.5 =========================================================== Information on CVSS is documented in HP Customer Notice: HPSN-2008-002 RESOLUTION HP has made the following software updates available to resolve the vulnerabilities in the impacted versions of HP Matrix Operating Environment HP Matrix Operating Environment 7.5.0 is only available on DVD. Please order the latest version of the HP Matrix Operating Environment 7.5.0 DVD #2 ISO from the following location: http://www.hp.com/go/insightupdates Choose the orange Select button. This presents the HP Insight Management Media order page. Choose Insight Management 7.5 DVD-2-ZIP August 2015 from the Software specification list. Fill out the rest of the form and submit it. HP has addressed these vulnerabilities for the affected software components bundled with the HP Matrix Operating Environment in the following HP Security Bulletins. HP Matrix Operating Environment component HP Security Bulletin Number Security Bulletin Location HP Systems Insight Manager (SIM) HPSBMU03394 HPSBMU03394 https://h20564.www2.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docId=emr_na-c04762744 HP System Management Homepage (SMH) HPSBMU03380 http://h20564.www2.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docId=emr_na-c04746490&la ng=en-us&cc= HP Version Control Agent (VCA) HPSBMU03397 https://h20564.www2.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docId=emr_na-c04765169 HP Version Control Repository Manager (VCRM) HPSBMU03396 https://h20564.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay/?docId=emr _na-c04765115 HP Virtual Connect Enterprise Manager (VCEM) SDK HPSBMU03413 https://h20564.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay/?docId=emr _na-c04774021 HISTORY Version:1 (rev.1) - 24 August 2015 Initial release Third Party Security Patches: Third party security patches that are to be installed on systems running HP software products should be applied in accordance with the customer's patch management policy. Support: For issues about implementing the recommendations of this Security Bulletin, contact normal HP Services support channel. For other issues about the content of this Security Bulletin, send e-mail to security-alert@hp.com. Report: To report a potential security vulnerability with any HP supported product, send Email to: security-alert@hp.com Subscribe: To initiate a subscription to receive future HP Security Bulletin alerts via Email: http://h41183.www4.hp.com/signup_alerts.php?jumpid=hpsc_secbulletins Security Bulletin Archive: A list of recently released Security Bulletins is available here: https://h20564.www2.hp.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/secBullArchive/ Software Product Category: The Software Product Category is represented in the title by the two characters following HPSB. 3C = 3COM 3P = 3rd Party Software GN = HP General Software HF = HP Hardware and Firmware MP = MPE/iX MU = Multi-Platform Software NS = NonStop Servers OV = OpenVMS PI = Printing and Imaging PV = ProCurve ST = Storage Software TU = Tru64 UNIX UX = HP-UX Copyright 2015 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Hewlett-Packard Company shall not be liable for technical or editorial errors or omissions contained herein. The information provided is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. To the extent permitted by law, neither HP or its affiliates, subcontractors or suppliers will be liable for incidental,special or consequential damages including downtime cost; lost profits; damages relating to the procurement of substitute products or services; or damages for loss of data, or software restoration. The information in this document is subject to change without notice. Hewlett-Packard Company and the names of Hewlett-Packard products referenced herein are trademarks of Hewlett-Packard Company in the United States and other countries. Other product and company names mentioned herein may be trademarks of their respective owners. SAP <http://www.sap.com/>has released the monthly critical patch update for June 2015. This patch update closes a lot of vulnerabilities in SAP products. The most popular vulnerability is Missing Authorization Check. This month, three critical vulnerabilities found by ERPScan researchers Vahagn Vardanyan, Rustem Gazizov, and Diana Grigorieva were closed. *Issues that were patched with the help of ERPScan* Below are the details of SAP vulnerabilities that were found byERPScan <http://www.erpscan.com/>researchers. * An XML eXternal Entity vulnerability in SAP Mobile Platform on-premise (CVSS Base Score:5.5).Updateis available in SAP Security Note2159601 <https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/2159601>. An attacker can use XML eXternal Entities to send specially crafted unauthorized XML requests, which will be processed by the XML parser. The attacker will get unauthorized access to the OS file system. * A Hardcoded Credentials vulnerability in SAP Cross-System Tools (CVSS Base Score:3.6).Updateis available in SAP Security Note2059659 <https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/2059659>. In addition, it is likely that the code will be implemented as a backdoor into the system. * A Hardcoded Credentials vulnerability in SAP Data Transfer Workbench (CVSS Base Score:2.1).Updateis available in SAP Security Note2057982 <https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/2057982>. In addition, it is likely that the code will be implemented as a backdoor into the system. *The most critical issues found by other researchers* Some of our readers and clients asked us to categorize the most critical SAP vulnerabilities to patch them first. Companies providing SAP Security Audit, SAP Security Assessment, or SAP Penetration Testing services can include these vulnerabilities in their checklists. The most critical vulnerabilities of this update can be patched by the following SAP Security Notes: * 2151237 <https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/2151237>: SAP GUI for Windows has a Buffer Overflow vulnerability (CVSS Base Score:9.3). An attacker can use Buffer Overflow for injecting specially crafted code into working memory, which will be executed by the vulnerable application under the privileges of that application. This can lead to the attacker taking complete control over the application, denial of service, command execution, and other attacks. In case of command execution,attackercan obtain critical technical and business-related information stored in the vulnerable SAP-system or escalate their own privileges. As for denial of service, the process of the vulnerable component may be terminated. For this time, nobody will be able to use this service, which negatively influences business processes, system downtime, and, consequently, business reputation. It is recommended to install this SAP Security Note to prevent risks. * 2129609 <https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/2129609>: SAP EP JDBC Connector has an SQL Injection vulnerability (CVSS Base Score:6.5). An attacker can use SQL Injections with the help of specially crafted SQL queries. They can read and modify sensitive information from a database, execute administrative operations in a database, destroy data or make it unavailable. In some cases, an attacker can access system data or execute OS commands. It is recommended to install this SAP Security Note to prevent risks. * 1997734 <https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1997734>: SAP RFC runtime has a Missing AuthorizationXheckvulnerability (CVSS Base Score:6.0). An attacker can use Missing Authorization Checks to access a service without any authorization procedures and use service functionality that has restricted access. It is recommended to install this SAP Security Note to prevent risks. * 2163306 <https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/2163306>: SAP CommonCryptoLib and SAPCRYPTOLIB are vulnerable to FREAK (CVE-2015-0204, CVSS Base Score:5.0). It allows an attacker to intercept HTTPS connections between vulnerable clients and servers and force them to use weakened encryption, which the attacker can break to steal or manipulate sensitive data. All the attacks on this page assume a network adversary (i.e. a man-in-the-middle) to tamper with TLS handshake messages. The typical scenario to mount such attacks is by tampering with the Domain Name System (DNS), for example via DNS rebinding or domain name seizure. This attack targets a class of deliberately weak export cipher suites. It is recommended to install this SAP Security Note to prevent risks. *References about the FREAK vulnerability:* * SMACK: State Machine AttaCKs <https://www.smacktls.com/> * Tracking the FREAK Attack <https://freakattack.com/> * CVE-2015-0204 <https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-0204> It is highly recommended to patch all those SAP vulnerabilities to prevent business risks affecting your SAP systems. SAP has traditionally thanked the security researchers from ERPScan for found vulnerabilities on theiracknowledgment page <http://scn.sap.com/docs/DOC-8218>. Advisories for those SAP vulnerabilities with technical details will be available in 3 months onerpscan.com <http://www.erpscan.com/>. -- Darya Maenkova PR manager <https://www.linkedin.com/company/2217474?trk=ppro_cprof> <https://twitter.com/erpscan> <http://erpscan.com/> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ e-mail: d.maenkova@erpscan.com <mailto:d.maenkova@erpscan.com> address: 228 Hamilton Avenue, Fl. 3, Palo Alto, CA. 94301 phone: 650.798.5255 erpscan.com <http://erpscan.com> . References: CVE-2014-8275 Cryptographic Issues (CWE-310) CVE-2014-3569 Remote Denial of Service (DoS) CVE-2014-3570 Cryptographic Issues (CWE-310) CVE-2014-3571 Remote Denial of Service (DoS) CVE-2014-3572 Cryptographic Issues (CWE-310) CVE-2015-0204 Cryptographic Issues (CWE-310) SSRT101885 SUPPORTED SOFTWARE VERSIONS*: ONLY impacted versions are listed. The updates are available from either of the following sites: ftp://sl098ze:Secure12@h2.usa.hp.com https://h20392.www2.hp.com/portal/swdepot/displayProductInfo.do?productNumber =OPENSSL11I HP-UX Release HP-UX OpenSSL depot name B.11.11 (11i v1) OpenSSL_A.00.09.08ze.001_HP-UX_B.11.11_32_64.depot B.11.23 (11i v2) OpenSSL_A.00.09.08ze.002_HP-UX_B.11.23_IA-PA.depot B.11.31 (11i v3) OpenSSL_A.00.09.08ze.003_HP-UX_B.11.31_IA-PA.depot MANUAL ACTIONS: Yes - Update Install OpenSSL A.00.09.08ze or subsequent PRODUCT SPECIFIC INFORMATION HP-UX Software Assistant: HP-UX Software Assistant is an enhanced application that replaces HP-UX Security Patch Check. It analyzes all Security Bulletins issued by HP and lists recommended actions that may apply to a specific HP-UX system. It can also download patches and create a depot automatically. For more information see: https://www.hp.com/go/swa The following text is for use by the HP-UX Software Assistant

AFFECTED PRODUCTS